I read recently that Coca-Cola has withdrawn its voicemail system from its Atlanta headquarters in an effort to improve productivity. Callers now get a simple message suggesting they should use another means of contact.
Voicemail was originally introduced as an 'added value' service for callers - saving them the need to call again - but is now seen as an 'overhead' that sucks time and effort out of the organisation. It is worse than email in some ways since taking down details from a voice message can take multiple listenings.
Presumably there are other services we have introduced as time-savers or value enhancers that will, in time, be regarded as unnecessary or positively harmful.
email? text messaging?
Or have Coca-Cola got it wrong. Will all those callers who are forced to ring again or use some other means of contacting Coca-Cola personnel simply vote with their feet, become annoyed, not bother to pursue their contact. I will be interested in any follow-up comments/actions once 'the dust settles'.
Voicemail was originally introduced as an 'added value' service for callers - saving them the need to call again - but is now seen as an 'overhead' that sucks time and effort out of the organisation. It is worse than email in some ways since taking down details from a voice message can take multiple listenings.
Presumably there are other services we have introduced as time-savers or value enhancers that will, in time, be regarded as unnecessary or positively harmful.
email? text messaging?
Or have Coca-Cola got it wrong. Will all those callers who are forced to ring again or use some other means of contacting Coca-Cola personnel simply vote with their feet, become annoyed, not bother to pursue their contact. I will be interested in any follow-up comments/actions once 'the dust settles'.
No comments:
Post a Comment